Shocking Analysis of the ‘Shooting Down’ of Malaysian #MH17

By Peter Haisenko |  Zur deutschen Version bitte hier anklicken


Peter Haisenko in Cockpit of Condor DC 10

The tragedy of Malaysian MH 017 continues to elude any light of clarity being cast over it. The flight recorders are in England and are evaluated. What can come of it? Maybe more than you would assume. Especially the voice recorder will be interesting when you look at the picture of a cockpit fragment. As an expert in aviation I closely looked at the images of the wreckage that are circulating on the Internet.

First, I was amazed at how few photos can be found from the wreckage with Google. All are in low resolution, except one: The fragment of the cockpit below the window on the pilots side. This image, however, is shocking. In Washington, you can now hear views expresssed of a “potentially tragic error / accident” regarding MH 017. Given this particular cockpit image it does not surprise me at all.

Entry and exit impact holes of projectiles in the cockpit area


Source for all photos: Internet

I recommend to click on the little picture to the right. You can download this photo as a PDF in good resolution. This is necessary, because that will allow you understand what I am describing here. The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can be seen, all bent outward, which indicate that shrapnel had forcefull exited through the outer skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open rivets are are also bent outward.

In sifting through the available images one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit are largely intact, except for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft remained . Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material. This is on account of the nose of any aircraft having to withstand the impact of a large bird at high speeds. You can see in the photo, that in this area significantly stronger aluminum alloys were being installed than in the remainder of the outer skin of the fuselage. One remembers the crash of Pan Am over Lockerbie. It was a large segment of the cockpit that due to the special architecture survived the crash in one piece. In the case of flight MH 017 it becomes abundantly clear that there also an explosion took place inside the aircraft.

Tank destroying mix of amunititon

Bullet holes in the outer skin

So what could have happened? Russia recently published radar recordings, that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in close proximity to MH 017. This corresponds with the statement of the now missing Spanish controller ‘Carlos’ that has seen two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity of MH 017. If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment!

Now just consider what happens when a series of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit. These are after all designed to destroy a modern tank. The anti-tank incendiary shells partially traversed the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly deformed shape. (Aviation forensic experts could possibly find them on the ground presumably controlled by the Kiev Ukrainian military; the translator). After all, their impact is designed to penetrate the solid armor of a tank. Also, the splinter-explosive shells will, due to their numerous impacts too cause massive explosions inside the cockpit, since they are designed to do this. Given the rapid firing sequence of the GSh-302 cannon, it will cause a rapid succession of explosions within the cockpit area in a very short time. Remeber each of these is sufficient to destroy a tank.

What “mistake” was actually being committed – and by whom?

Graze on the wing

Because the interior of a commercial aircraft is a hermetically sealed pressurized chamber, the explosions will, in split second, increase the pressure inside the cabin to extreme levels or breaking point. An aircraft is not equipped for this, it will burst like a balloon. This explains a coherent scenario. The largely intact fragments of the rear sections broke in mid air at the weaker points of contstruction most likely under extreme internal air pressure. The images of the widely scattered field of debris and the brutally damaged segment of cockpit fit like hand in glove. Furthermore, a wing segment shows traces of a grazing shot, which in direct extension leads to the cockpit. Interestingly, I found that both the high-resolution photo of the fragment of bullet riddled cockpit as well as the segment of grazed wing have in the meantime disappeared from Google Images. One can find virtually no more pictures of the wreckage, except the well known smoking ruins.

If you listen to the voices from Washington now who speak of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here. I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with Presdient Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles. Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot Presdient Putin with a Kalashnikov.

But that this remains pure speculation. The shelling of the cockpit of air Malaysia MH 017, however, is definitely not.

Nach oben


“Support MH17 Truth”: OSCE Monitors Identify “Shrapnel and Machine Gun-Like Holes” indicating Shelling. No Evidence of a Missile Attack. Shot Down by a Military Aircraft?

Peter Haisenko’s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the MH17, within proximity of the plane.

Ironically, the presence of a military aircraft is also confirmed by a BBC  report conducted at the crash site on July 23.

US And Ukraine Fabricated Evidence To Blame Russia And The Rebels 

There is now a growing body of irrefutable evidence which points directly to the MH17 shoot down being a classic false flag operation. Each piece of evidence definitively places at least three nations at the scene of both the crime and the cover-up.

Whereas the Ukraine government and military executed this cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians, most likely under the direct supervision of the CIA, the US and UK governments have been implementing the non-stop coverup and false flag operation. Read further







Banker Deaths Climb to 15, as Goldman Sachs Managing Director Found Dead

2012 The Awakening

Note: The cabals house of cards is rapidly falling. When banksters continue to drop dead, one by one, whether it’s by suicide, accident or murder  – it’s a sure sign the death-of-the-U.S. dollar is at hand.

There are Higher hands working behind the scenes seeking remedy and resolution to release countless generations of ancestral karma connected to the system of domination and control. Now is the time to connect with our ancestral heritage and the spirits of our ancestors who are opening pathways for us to follow. Listen and connect daily, learn to follow their guidance and wisdom…for they are the keys to an enlightened future for the next seven generations.

Melissa Melton
The Daily Sheeple
July 22nd, 2014


bank failure

Another high level banker has been found dead.

Nicholas Valtz, a 39-year old managing director at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York, was found dead Sunday afternoon in…

View original post 743 more words

Feds doled out millions towards Tor online anonymity tools



The National Security Agency may be working to crack the anonymous Tor browser, but the US government actually donated close to $2 million to the project in 2013.

In fact, the large majority of the money gifted to the Tor Project has its origins in the State Department and the Department of Defense.

According to the Guardian, the US government delivered a little more than $1.8 million to Tor last year – an increase over the $1.2 million given in 2012. Some of that money was direct – the State Department issued $256,900 while the National Science Foundation donated $100,325 – but most of it was delivered through third parties and non-profit organizations.

“The two largest single grantors of federal money were SRI international, a non-profit research and development centre that aims to bridge the gap between abstract research and industry, and Internews Network, an international non-profit that funds programmes supporting democracy and human rights,” wrote Alex Hern at the Guardian. “The latter gave $555,413 in funding originally from the US Department of State, while the former gave $830,269 in funding ultimately stemming from the US Department of Defense.”

Also known as “The Onion Router,” Tor is a free internet browser that allows users to bypass online censorship as well as avoid surveillance. Although the browser was initially released back in 2002, it has gained notoriety ever since revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed the US intelligence agency to be collecting large amounts of data on individuals. Snowden himself has recommended Tor to users looking to keep the government at bay.

Last year, a separate Guardian report revealed that the NSA and the United Kingdom’s GCHQ have made multiple attempts to break through Tor’s privacy settings, with limited success. As RT reported recently, Russia is also attempting the same, with its Interior Ministry offering $111,000 to anyone who can help the government crack the network.

Meanwhile, a report by PandoDaily in July showed that most of those involved with developing Tor – itself a project built in coordination with the Navy – were funded by and still used by the US government.

The website raised concern over the possibility that a conflict of interests could exist, since so much money for the project comes from the state. According to the project’s tax documents, Tor aided the Defense Department in areas related to “communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.”

As effective as Tor can be, it isn’t perfect. In May, Microsoft security expert Andy Malone said that while the network itself is still effective, there are weak points that can be taken advantage of by data collectors.

“At the moment the Tor network’s security has never been broken, but there are flaws around it that can be exploited,” Malone said at the time.

“Tor leaks do occur through third-party apps and add-ons, like Flash. If I was doing forensics on you and thought you were on Tor I wouldn’t attack the network I’d attack the weak areas around it.”




Fact Check #125





I thought it best to move on from FC 124, and the unpleasant topic surrounding it. It’s time to once again to assume a readiness posture and remain patient for events that are germane to our work to transpire. We continue to watch with high anticipation and expectation.

We do not know in what precise form these events will manifest themselves to the general public. Such exact plans are not a part of our pay grade, and never will be. That is perhaps a very good thing. However, as we ALL know, these plans are real, they are going to come about, and we have been warned to prepare for them (See FC115). If, by some chance, we are entrusted to release information of a contemporaneous nature, we will do so. By that I mean, “as the…

View original post 530 more words

#MH17 – Why I’ll soon be flying again on Malaysia Airlines

The Malay Mail Online

by Adam Minter – Bloomberg columnist

JULY 27 — How grim can it get for Malaysia Airlines? Earlier this week the carrier announced that it’s offering no-questions-asked refunds or postponements on all tickets valid for travel in 2014 — including previously non-refundable tickets. It’s a generous offer, and one that the airline no doubt expected many passengers to accept in the numb aftermath of its serial air disasters — Flights MH370 and MH17. Indeed, of the 680 total air fatalities so far in 2014 — another large crash and this will be the worst year for fatalities since 2005, according to Bloomberg News — an astonishing 537 resulted from the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines flights. Who, at this point, wants to fly that airline?

I do.

In fact, I regularly fly Malaysia Airlines and have two reservations on the carrier (one actually on a subsidiary) for later this year. With apologies to friends and family who regularly send me notes such as, “You don’t need to fly Malaysia,” (and to the publisher who wrote “no Malaysia Air” on notes regarding a future book tour), I have no more intention of cancelling those reservations than of cancelling my reservations on Delta and American for next week. The reason is straightforward: Air travel remains the safest means of getting from point A to point B. (Moreover, prior to this year’s accidents, Malaysia Airlines had a stellar safety record.) It’s a point that Tony Tyler, director general and chief executive officer of the International Air Transport Association, made in a statement this week:

Every day, approximately 100,000 flights take to the sky and land without incident. In 2013 more than three billion people flew and there were 210 fatalities. Regrettably, we have surpassed that number already this year. But even so, getting on an aircraft is still among the safest activities that one can do.

Of course, that doesn’t minimise the tragic loss of life this week in Ukraine, Mali and Taiwan. There is grief to bear, mourning to be done and failures to be investigated — to prevent similar accidents in the future. But even as causes and blame are assessed, it’s important to keep in perspective the stunning safety record that global air travel has achieved over many decades.

According to the International Civil Aviation Organisation’s most recent report on global air safety, the global air accident rate declined 13 per cent from 2012 to 2013, from 3.2 accidents per million departures to 2.8 accidents per million departures. In real terms, that’s a decline from 99 fatalities in 388 accidents, to 90 fatalities in 173 accidents. In 2005, by comparison, there were 119 accidents with 825 fatalities (and in 1985 there were more than 2,000 air crash deaths resulting from dozens of accidents). It’s also worth noting that the last decade’s decline took place during a period of “historic growth rates” for passenger traffic, globally.

This has been an exceptionally bad week for flying. Nevertheless, according to Malaysia Airlines, neither the fatalities nor its generous refund policy has resulted in a surge in requests for refunds. For airlines and civil aviation authorities around the world, that’s a deserved vote of confidence. The skies remain safe. — Bloomberg




#MH17 – The false flags of TERROR

The big picture of the downing of MH17

false flags

The event organizers:

  • US Corporation
  • NATO (North Atlantic Terror Organization) – EU and US

The financiers:

  • The banksters – Federal Reserve, BIS, ECB, IMF, World Bank

The pawns:

  • Ukraine
  • Malaysia

The catalyst:

  • Malaysia Airlines (Two B777s)

The target:

  • Russia (and the BRICS)


  • World War III

The purpose:

  • To revive the cabal’s petrodollar and world hegemony

View Infographics


Nearly two weeks later, neither the US nor Europe has provided substantial evidence of any sort to support their assertions that Ukrainian separatists and/or Russia are to blame for the MH-17 catastrophe. There’s literally been nothing.

In the meantime, very important questions surrounding the shoot-down have gone entirely unaddressed by US officials and the western media. Why? read further…

The BIG Picture

Not even Hollywood could come up with such a plot; Israel gets away with unlawful premeditated mass murder of civilians, while Russia gets framed for an airborne mass murder of civilians that has all the makings of being set up by the Kiev vassals of Russia’s Western“partners”. – Pepe Escobar. read further..