The Too-Big-to-Fail Banks Have Failed and How Come The Whole World is Still Up and Running?

I am no economist. Keynesian economics makes no sense to me nor does any of the financial gurus’ reports.

Since 2008 there have been numerous reports about too-big-to-fail banks that have failed and more are failing as we speak.

These are a few big name banks to mention:

wells fargo

My question is why are they still standing? Oh yeah I know its got something to do with ‘bailouts’ and QE. The bailors are the central banks and governments. I think I can understand the central banks’ role in this, but I don’t understand governments bailing out the failed banks. Governments don’t have their own money and are in perpetual (national) debts which are too big-to-repay as the debts ‘grow’ every seconds, hour, day, week, month and yearly.

Let’s try to see the clear picture and try to understand what a “bank failure” means and its repercussions:

A bank failure occurs when a bank is unable to meet its obligations to its depositors or other creditors because it has become insolvent or too illiquid to meet its liabilities. More specifically, a bank usually fails economically when the market value of its assets declines to a value that is less than the market value of its liabilities. The insolvent bank either borrows from other solvent banks or sells its assets at a lower price than its market value to generate liquid money to pay its depositors on demand. The inability of the solvent banks to lend liquid money to the insolvent bank creates a bank panic among the depositors as more depositors try to take out cash deposits from the bank. As such, the bank is unable to fulfill the demands of all of its depositors on time. Also, a bank may be taken over by the regulating government agency if Shareholders Equity (i.e. capital ratios) are below the regulatory minimum. – wiki

In the above picture (if that’s accurate), a bank failure means it affects and virtually freezes all its customers’ activities be it business or personal in nature. Its just like when the electric power supplier stops every one will be in the dark.

The failure of a bank is generally considered to be of more importance than the failure of other types of business firms because of the interconnectedness and fragility of banking institutions. Research has shown that the market value of customers of the failed banks is adversely affected at the date of the failure announcements. It is often feared that the spill over effects of a failure of one bank can quickly spread throughout the economy and possibly result in the failure of other banks, whether or not those banks were solvent at the time as the marginal depositors try to take out cash deposits from these banks to avoid from suffering losses. Thereby, the spill over effect of bank panic or systemic risk has a multiplier effect on all banks and financial institutions leading to a greater effect of bank failure in the economy. As a result, banking institutions are typically subjected to rigorous regulation, and bank failures are of major public policy concern in countries across the world. – wiki

But according to wiki (again), a certain bank’s failure has the “spill over effect” and that to me seems catastrophic and that’s my big question –“How come the whole world is still up and running?”

Who or what organization / institution is holding and keeping the movie running when the theater have no more movies?

As aforementioned, the failure of a bank is relevant not only to the country in which it is headquartered, but for all other nations that it conducts business with. This dynamic was highlighted quite dramatically in the 2008 financial crisis, during which the failures of major bulge bracket investment banks held dire consequences for local economies throughout the broader global market. The high degree to which markets are integrated in the global economy made this a near inevitability. This interconnectedness was manifested not on a high level, with respect to deals negotiated between major companies from different parts of the world, but also to the global nature of any one company’s makeup. Outsourcing is a key example of this makeup. As major banks such as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns failed, the employees from countries other than the United States suffered in turn. – wiki

Whoever or whatever has the capacity to keep the world running after the banks have failed must be a power to reckon with, so mighty perhaps second only to god?

Originally posted on Steemit






One thought on “The Too-Big-to-Fail Banks Have Failed and How Come The Whole World is Still Up and Running?

  1. Pingback: NYSE and its stocks will sink to the bottom of the ocean if they were in a shipping container | Satu Insan – Malaysia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.