You’ve Heard People Compare #Trump to Hitler. So We Asked a Woman Who Was Born in Nazi Germany…


Independent Journal Review

By Justen Charters

A popular talking point on the left is that Donald Trump has things in common with Hitler.


But is this the case? Independent Journal Review decided to speak to a woman born in Nazi Germany about the comparison.

We talked with Marion Ingeborg Andrews, who goes by Inga. She was born in Dusseldorf, Germany, in 1940 during Hitler’s reign.

While most kids were playing with friends, Andrews was hiding in air raid shelters and helping to clean up the rubble from destroyed buildings to rebuild her city.

Inga Andrews

Andrews said:

“What is going on in this country is giving me chills. Trump is not like Hitler. Just because a leader wants order doesn’t mean they’re like a dictator.

What reminds me more of Hitler than anything else isn’t Trump, it’s the destruction of freedom of speech on the college campuses — the agendas fueled by the professors.

That’s how Hitler started, he pulled in the youth to miseducate them, to brainwash them, it’s happening today.”

Andrews drove home her point further for the younger generation:

Getty Images/Frederic J. Brown

“It saddens me that we are teaching garbage in the schools and in the college. We don’t teach history anymore. History repeats itself over and over.

The kids out there today haven’t ever lived through a war like I did. I remember sitting in a rock pile, cleaning rocks, to rebuild Germany. I remember eating maple leaves and grass to survive.”

She later made it to the U.S. when her mother married an American, but her journey wasn’t without hurdles. 

Inga Andrews

“It took six years because she had worked in Germany. It took six years to clear her to be able to be married. Then when you married an American, because we were the enemy, you had to wait.

We had to go from Heidelberg to Bremerhaven where another camp was. This camp was run by the U.S. military. They vetted us in both places. There were all these German brides with their children and families who had to be vetted again for three of four days before they could get on the ship.

The ship we took was the U.S.S. Washington. We arrived in New York in March of 1953. My mother, Meta Weinbach, and I still had the last name Muller.

So we had a vetting process like what we are going through now because you have to have this to make the country safe.”

Then Andrews had some choice words for the protesters in the streets destroying property:

“America needs to grow up. The young people who are rioting and destroying property, who have no respect for elders and freedom of speech, I was so proud to become a citizen of this country.”

She opened up about how she accepted American culture and values:

Inga Andrews

Andrews continued on about her desire to become an American:

“At school, they put me in first grade even though I was a teenager because I didn’t speak English. The teachers would take time at their lunch time to teach us how to speak English.

But they came to find out that I was hiding in the bathroom stall with my legs up eating my braunschweiger and onion sandwich, so nobody would talk to me.

Still, I had a burning desire to be an American. I went to night school to learn English. I would practice English without a German accent. I didn’t want to be German. I wanted to be an American.

When I was fourteen, I was working in a drug store reading comic books. Through reading comic books, I developed my English skills.

We would go to the malls and we wouldn’t speak our foreign language, we would speak English. Because we believed we needed to honor the country that opened its doors for us. It was rude to do otherwise.”

Andrews returned to the present day with a message for those attacking freedom of speech:

“Professors shouldn’t be telling their students to go after freedom of speech. They should be telling them that this is the greatest country in the world.

The demonstrators can’t tell you why they’re demonstrating. I’m not a Republican. I’m not a Democrat. I just want the country to be at peace.

I see what is happening here reflecting some of the things we saw in Germany, and it’s terrifying. It’s sad. But it’s not because of Trump. It’s because of poor education.

Trump is not like Hitler. The theory that he is is propaganda. Yes, I lived through some of Nazi Germany, but all you have to do is read some books about that period to see how wrong that theory is.”

She finished by sharing a personal story.

“I had an aunt who was in the Olympics. My aunt got all this extra stuff from Hitler and was surrounded by this propaganda,” she said, before explaining how she couldn’t keep a relationship with her aunt. “I couldn’t have anything to do with her. Even after the war, she was calling the Jewish people, of whom I was friends with, ‘dirty Jews.’”

“My point in saying all this is that if people aren’t able to see outside of one world view, that’s what happens,” Andrews concluded. “They buy the propaganda. And that’s what is happening today. And if people aren’t educated properly and given the ability to think freely — we will repeat that history.”

Due to numerous inquiries into the authenticity of Inga’s story, she’s provided Independent Journal Review with several pieces of proof to back up her claims.

Her mother, Meta Weinbach’s passport:

Inga Andrews

Inga Andrews

Evidence of their time in Heidelberg:

Inga Andrews

Inga with her father Heinz Muller during World War II:

Inga Andrews

The postcard she received upon boarding the S.S. Washington. Andrews’s family rode first class:

Inga Andrews

Her American step-father George Weinbach:

Inga Andrews

Upon sending these pieces of proof to back up her story, Andrews told us, “It’s exactly what I’ve been saying. Some people want to see through one world view, so they couldn’t even believe the story I lived.”

 

..

Advertisements

Forever Prince Charlie – It takes a Nazi to know another


Russia Today

​Prince Charles strikes another blow for the British republic

charlie

There is an air of unreality to Prince Charles’ spin-squad attempting this week to prove that the future British Head of State’s comparison of Putin to Hitler, while surrounded by journalists on a royal tour, was said in a ‘private conversation’.

It is not just that his views show how out of touch he and his PR team are with the nation and the real world, but Charles’ flippant remarks draw unwelcome attention to his own and his family’s close connections to Nazis, and related war-mongering.

His father Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh was educated for a time in Nazi Germany and his four sisters married black-uniformed SS officers (three of them, Sophie, Cecile and Margarita, joining the Nazi party). Philip admitted to then having ‘inhibitions about the Jews’ to an American academic and feeling ‘jealousy of their success.’ Charles’ great uncle, the abdicated ex-King Edward VIII, was such a swastika-waver that MI6 had to banish him to Bermuda for the duration of World War Two, thwarting his and his Nazi wife Mrs Simpson’s attempts to join Hitler by crossing into occupied Europe.

Charles himself has come quite close to publicly endorsing Hitler’s slippery chief Architect and Armaments Minister Albert Speer by hiring Speer’s greatest devotee, Léon Krier, as his own chief architect for his Duchy of Cornwall’s extensive building projects. Writer and broadcaster Jonathan Meades in his 1994 documentary, ‘Jerry Building’ nails Krier as the ‘Speer-carrier’ and ‘Keeper of the Toxic Flame’, pointing out that every one of Speer’s creations, which include the Nuremberg rally stadium, is inseparable from the inhuman experimentation and forced concentration camp labor used to construct them.

Charles’ great grandfather George V was one of the three ‘great’ architects of World War One, the so-called ‘Cousins’ War’, four years of mindless slaughter that began exactly a century ago. With two more Saxe-Coburg Gotha cousins, George’s hapless subjects slugged it out in trench warfare with Germany’s Wilhelm II and Russia’s Nicholas II’s unfortunates leaving, by 1918, a total of some ten million dead for no discernible purpose.

When in 1917 ill-mannered soldiers began pointing out that German Gotha bombers from another branch of the King’s family business were killing them, George V blithely announced that his surname was changing from ‘Saxe-Coburg Gotha’ to the more English-sounding ‘Windsor’.

Even masterpieces like Richard Attenborough’s 1969 feature film ‘Oh! What A Lovely War’, the BBC’s controversial 1986 drama ‘The Monocled Mutineer’ and the poetry of Geoffrey Studdert-Kennedy, Worcester army padre known affectionately as ‘Woodbine Willie’, do not quite reflect the futility of the war and the bitterness it stirred up amongst ordinary people.

Today, despite standing against the Nazis in World War Two, Her Majesty’s government and armed forces, who all swear allegiance to the Queen, are backing most of the dictators and despots around the world. From President Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri Lanka with the blood of 40,000 innocent Tamil civilians on his hands, to King Abdullah’s brutal Saudi regime which still practices public beheadings. Charles’ tongue always speaks for the world leaders Amnesty International tells us are the bad guys, but he is looking to make money with them, whether through real estate or arms.

Are we witnessing the death throes of the British monarchy?

It started thirty six years after the bloodthirsty Knights Templar warrior-bankers were disgraced and dissolved, a new order of 26 ‘knights’ were initiated in 1348 that have dominated the British crown ever since. The Order of the Garter consists of two conjoined cells, each of thirteen knights that advise and ‘protect’ the monarch and heir apparent.

Because of their obsessive secrecy and lack of transparency over the centuries those appointed to these knights have become the very antithesis of Medieval chivalry, a lethal mixture of yes-men, and devious chancers who would sell their own mother to get a seat, and a cut of the rent, at the top table.

Nothing could illustrate more clearly the British monarchy’s distain for their poor subjects than Henry VIII’s asset seizure and eviction in the 1530s of around ten thousand monks from Britain’s monasteries. Since the days of Alfred the Great these holy orders had been providing a backbone of education and healthcare to the nation, but to Henry they represented a kind of Vatican fifth column, daring to question the wisdom of his break from Rome to form his independent Church of England.

In 1638, with special pleadings from Archbishop Laud, Charles I addressed the privatization of land, enclosure, by fining rich merchants and parliamentarians who had evicted villagers from collectively managed open fields. Only ‘freemen’ owning land worth over 40 shillings a year could vote so the merchants had effectively been voting themselves growing land the poor needed to feed themselves.

Charles I, perhaps bravely, perhaps foolishly, tried to buck the trend of the creeping privatization of land, but the merchants secretly organised against him, launched the English Civil War and he lost his head in 1649. The merchant classes were now firmly in power and ready to bring their new-fangled capitalism to the world.

The meddling ‘black spider’ prince

Whether Charles’ meddling in politics today is for good or ill in Britain we can only guess because he spends hundreds of thousands of pounds, even more than he spends on PR, on confidentiality lawyers to stop the British public finding out. Not only has he been shown to be secretly vetoing legislation passed by parliament which he doesn’t like but sending regular hand-written ‘black spider’ directives to Secretaries of State.

Charles’ lawyers have fought a four year battle against Guardian journalist Rob Evans to keep these communications secret, arguing that as a private citizen he is not covered by the Freedom of Information Act. So far he has succeeded in keeping these directives, which professor of constitutional law at Manchester University Rodney Brazier modestly described as a ‘constitutional innovation’, secret.

How the nation is to deal with Charles’ secret stretching of what is expressly a non-political office, in a way that his mother Queen Elizabeth rarely appears to have done, hangs in the air like a constitutional bad smell. If his mother’s rare missive to the Labour Home Secretary demanding the arrest of radical Muslim cleric Abu-Hamza are anything to go by Charles’ letters would be revealing indeed.

Don’t mention Diana

Visitors to Charles’ country estate, Highgrove House in Gloucestershire, are disappointed to find all traces of Princess Diana are notable by their absence, even from the gift shop where she would no doubt turn a handsome profit. Despite William and Harry doing much of their growing up here their mother’s name, image and memory has been entirely expunged.

This is a pity since Diana and the boys spent many of their happiest times in and around the market town of Tetbury, nestling as it does in the heart of the Cotswolds countryside. On Sunday mornings in the late 1980s and early 1990s Diana could be spotted with young Princes William and Harry slipping into the back rows of St Mary the Virgin and St Mary Magdalen Church after the service had begun to avoid attention, looking for all the world like just any other young mum with her boys. After church they’d cycle back down country lanes back to Highgrove, a couple of miles south of the town.

Locals say the threesome made a sport of evading royal protection squad police officers who were supposed to be following them at all times but whom the princess saw as ‘claustrophobic’, putting up a barrier between them and passers-by. Diana insisted on bringing the boys up ‘to see themselves as the same as everyone else.’ Teaching them to talk in a down-to-earth, relaxed way with the public.

But after the adultery with Camilla and subsequent divorce, Diana was now a ‘problem’ for Charles and the Queen. According to Australian investigative journalist John Morgan they set up what they called the ‘Way Ahead Group’ (WAG) to manage the three fold ‘Diana problem’.

Firstly her anti-land mines campaign was threatening arms company profits both in France and Britain, then she was using the British press to successfully assert herself as a national figure and finally WAG meetings became more urgent because Diana was about to announce her engagement to Dodi Al Fayed, meaning William and Harry might be about to get a Muslim stepfather.

In Morgan’s 2012 book ‘Paris-London Connection, The Assassination of Princess Diana’, John Morgan says evidence revealed in the two police enquiries and inquest suggested the Queen and Prince Charles tipped the wink to Britain’s Foreign Intelligence Service MI6, that if Diana were to have an ‘accident’ nobody at the palace would mind.

Keith Allen’s 2011 documentary ‘Unlawful Killing’ which examines the decade late Diana inquest, proves beyond doubt that her death was no accident. But the film has not been shown on TV and been suppressed online and in the cinemas by the deep-pocketed royal lawyers. It may never now be shown in Britain.

Charles is descended from the other Vlad, from Transylvania

Charles is of course responsible for none of his royal predecessors’ turbulent history but like anyone else he can and should choose his own way. The path of secrecy and the PR wall he has attempted to construct around himself simply will not wash in today’s connected world, serving only to alienate him from most of his 65 million subjects.

However the Putin Nazi lie has gained unhappy momentum because Britain’s three party leaders have shown contempt both for the constitution and public by backing the prince against the facts and the national interest.

What they have shown by weighing in to support Charles’ slur against Russia is that Britain’s ruling elite, including the arms manufacturers, can be dictators deciding in private meetings amongst themselves what foreign policy to pursue. Even in election week our so-called top politicians don’t have the backbone to stand up to the establishment, however brazen the lies.

Outside his charmed circle, Charles’ ungracious remarks will persuade very few here in Britain. They demonstrate both a perverse underplaying of the 25 million Soviet dead of World War Two and a further move toward nuclear war today in Europe. The party leaders have also refused to recognize Charles’ own government and armed forces’ backing for the post-coup Ukrainian government, key ‘Right Sector’ elements of which proudly sport pictures of Nazis such as war criminal Stepan Bandera on their Kiev walls.

Charles does not understand, as his mother appears to have done, that he cannot have it both ways as Head of State and as a politician. Charles’ devil-may-care remarks have invited disdain for him at home and for Britain abroad. Ironically, for the man who is proud of his Transylvanian ‘Dracula’ ancestry, being descended from the fifteenth century despot Vlad the Impaler, they represent one more nail in the coffin of the British monarchy.

RT

.

home

.

Belgium Wants to Kill Off Children and the Demented


logolp

November 1, 2013 • 9:32AM

Belgium, which followed the Dutch in legalizing euthanasia in 2002, is considering taking the next step in Hitler’s T-4 program — killing children and the demented. In an article in the “Health and Science” (!) section of Thursday’s Washington Post, it is reported that the ruling Socialist Party in Belgium is considering extending their euthanasia law to children — a first for any country — and would also allow the murder of adults with early dementia — with their demented “approval,” of course.

WAPO reports: “Belgium is already a euthanasia pioneer. In the last decade, the number of reported cases per year has risen from 235 deaths in 2003 to 1,432 in 2012, the last year for which statistics are available. Doctors typically give patients a powerful sedative before injecting another drug to stop their heart.”

The Christian Democratic Flemish party has vowed to oppose the legislation and to challenge it in the European Court of Human Rights if it passes. However, the Post claims to be paraphrasing an Archbishop who opposes euthanasia, but argues for “alternatives like palliative sedation which make euthanasia unnecessary — and relieves doctors of the burden of having to kill patients.” This is Tony Blair’s Liverpool Pathway, in which, the Post notes, “patients are sedated and life-sustaining support is withdrawn so they starve to death; the process can take days.”

It should be recalled that Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the key authors of Obamacare, wrote in 1996 that, in order to achieve a “just allocation of health care resources,” useless eaters (in Hitler’s term), starting with the demented, should be denied health care. In his own words:

“Services that promote the continuation of the polity — those that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberation — are to be socially guaranteed as basic. Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”

See “Ezekiel Emanuel: Death to Those With Dementia, as Useless Eaters”

1373381991_Home

The Abdication of ‘Queen’ Elizabeth II We are NOW in an Interregnum


Friday, February 15, 2013

The Abdication of ‘Queen’ Elizabeth II We are NOW in an Interregnum

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room

The Abdication of ‘Queen’ Elizabeth II We are NOW in an Interregnum
.

Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 15-Feb-2013 13:00:56

There is an audio file on the link, below..

————————————————————————–

Snip

So the person called Queen Elizabeth II is actually an ‘Invention of Tradition’ carrying a 160-year line of Illegitimate Royals who were brought in concurrently with the British Empire being a Mafia Empire.

What we’ve had is a Mafia Royalty and that was due to last for 200 years from 1812 to 2012. So now it’s the time to bring it out, to show that the Royal Families that we’ve had from 1852 on have been illegitimate.

So I thought I give you a brief rundown on the illegitimacy, just like a shorthand version of the previous interview which is up on video on www.theworldoftruth.net as ‘Hallett Report No. 5’, and that was the interview we did, recorded on the 30th of December and played by you on the 31st of December 2012, kind of given us the last word for 2012.

Queen Victoria had 9 official children. Before that she had one child that was born legitimately and in marriage. That was Marcos Manoel. The other 9 children were born bigamously and from incest, unbeknownst to Queen Victoria; and incest is not illegal if you don’t know about it, but the person who sired the children did know; so he would be guilty of incest and that was Lionel Nathan Rothschild – as the siring partner. Prince Consort Albert didn’t sire any of Queen Victoria’s official 9 children.

So the next person to reign after Queen Victoria died on the 22nd of January 1901 was King Edward VII, who also knew that his elder legitimate half-brother was alive.

So King Edward VII’s coronation was delayed for 18 months from the 22nd of January 1901 to the 9th of August 1902. At the same time, King Edward VII got the Secretary of War, Lord Kitchener, to alter the mandate of Freemasonry, which was originally about keeping the True Monarch on the Throne, and he changed it to, whatever it is today.

In the Colonies, like in New Zealand, it’s extremely corrupt and supports massive wrong-doings and the same is true of other countries as well. So there is a correction there that needs to be made.

Now King Edward VII and his reign from 1901 to 1910 organised the murder of the Portuguese Royal Family, organised the Abdication of the next Royal Family, organised the murder of his legitimate older half-brother, and then passed instructions on to his son, King George V, who reigned from 1910 to 1936, to assassinate the exiled King of Portugal, King Manuel II of Portugal, in Twickenham in South London. So that destroyed the last vestiges, or thereabouts, of the last vestiges of the Portuguese Royal Family.

And then we had from 1936 to 1936, January to December, we had King Edward VIII who was never crowned.

And then we had King George VI from 1936–52, who was crowned, but he was retarded; and he had a child with the person referred to as the ‘Queen Mother’ or ‘Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’, and that child turned out to be epileptic.

So King George VI was removed from being the siring male. He was replaced with Winston Churchill who was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII. So there was still some supposed Royal blood there, but it was from incest. King Edward VII was a Warlord. Winston Churchill, his biological son, was also a Warlord.

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was initially engaged to the person who became King Edward VIII, who reigned January to December 1936. He told her he was going to abdicate, so then she was given the option to become engaged to the person who became King George VI, but he had knocked knees and was one IQ point above retarded. So she brought in her ‘Whipping Boy’ to became engaged and then marry King George VI. Now the ‘Whipping Boy’ is somebody that an aristocrat is raised with, and sometimes it doubles for them in photos. And sometimes there’s two photos taken, with say the brother, where Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon is photographed as a child with the brother, and then the ‘Whipping Boy’ is also photographed with the brother, as the sister.

So what you’ve got is photographic opportunity to show a complete history. And the ‘Whipping Boy’ came from Waterford, in Ireland, and the Irish accent had to be taught out of it, so it was more of a Scottish brogue.

The true Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon got married and lived in France and died in 1950. And I got this from a British and European Royal who is incredibly renegade, so Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s ‘Whipping Boy’ married King George VI, and then Winston Churchill provided the sperm for the artificial insemination with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s Whipping Boy, resulting in Princess Elizabeth who was born above the Coach & Horses pub in Mayfair in London.

And that’s why Queen Elizabeth II’s nickname is “Lilybeth la bonne” meaning “The Maid”. That meant, she was the daughter of the Maid, the daughter of the ‘Whipping Boy’.

Then when King George V died in 1952, the very illegitimate Princess Elizabeth became ‘Queen Elizabeth II’.

In 1946, Prince Philip became engaged to Princess Elizabeth under the extortion of Lord Louis Mountbatten.

Lord Louis Mountbatten extorted the ‘Whipping Boy’, Queen consort Elizabeth and King George VI on the basis that the Royal Family had been fake since 1852.

So in order to retain the crown, they sold their daughter into marriage to Prince Philip, and it appears that Lord Louis Mountbatten also included rights for under-aged sex with the firstborn – Prima Nocte, Droit du seigneur, Right of the Lord where the Lord takes the virginity of the serves – and that was Prince Charles.

And there’s photos of Prince Charles and Lord Louis Mountbatten shaking hands at a Polo event when Prince Charles was still quite young.

Jim Fetzer: Greg, would you repeat that, he had the first rights to ‘sex’?

Greg Hallett: Yes.

Jim Fetzer: Sex!

Greg Hallett: Yes.

Jim Fetzer: S. E. X.!

Greg Hallett: Yes. Lord Louis Mountbatten had first rights to sex with the firstborn of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, which was Prince Charles.

So Prince Charles was a paedophile victim from obviously a young age.

Lord Louis Mountbatten was absolutely known for his paedophilia and he was known for having schools under his own name, like “Mountbatten School” in Singapore, and one of the pupils there spoke to me. He would have been in his mid- to late 50s, and he was saying that it was his role to meet Lord Louis Mountbatten at the gate when he was about 5 or 6 years old, and after that he couldn’t remember what happened in the next few days, and then he started to have very adult thoughts flashing across his mind, like sexual thoughts. And it appears that Lord Louis Mountbatten was testing drugs for Roche including Darken and Silence and Date Rape Drugs, and using it for sex with children.

Now other people have also brought out that Lord Louis Mountbatten is a paedophile.

Now Lord Louis Mountbatten introduced the well-known paedophile Jimmy Savile to Prince Charles. They used to spend quite a bit of time together and go to parties together. A lot of it was under the guise of charity events. On Jimmy Savile’s 80th birthday, Prince Charles sent Jimmy Savile a pair of gold cufflinks, a box of cigars, and a note saying “No one will ever know what you’ve done for this country”.

There’s now just a phenomenal amount of children that Jimmy Savile’s abused.

And it appears that Prince Charles was definitely not the father of Prince William and is not the father of Prince Harry, and it was Princess Diana who ensured this, possibly on the knowledge that she knew ‘A’ definitely that Prince Charles was having a long standing affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, and that Prince Charles may have been a paedophile.

And that may be why the current Laws of Succession are completely bypassing Prince Charles.

Prince Philip and Lord Louis Mountbatten also had sexual relations. Prince Philip was also known for getting drunk on Royal Navy Ships and then falling over on the stomach so that he could be sodomized. And some of the sailors who sodomised him told co-researchers of mine that “Oh yeah, I had Prince Philip!” So he was quite into sodomy, and into children, and now on Sandringham Estate in Norfolk they’re finding lots of bodies of children and women buried around in the yards.

So it looks like Prince Philip, who extorted his marriage with Princess Elizabeth, is a paedophile who then agreed to marry Princess Elizabeth, and that their firstborn would be sodomised as a child by Lord Louis Mountbatten.

Jim Fetzer: This is all so unbelievably disgusting!

Greg Hallett: Well …

Jim Fetzer: What was the location where the bodies of women and children have been found again?

Greg Hallett: Sandringham House, which is actually Sandringham Palace. And it is actually on the Dragon Line that runs from Transylvania where Prince Charles has bought a lot of properties. It’s where the Dracula Castle is.

Snip

Greg Hallett: Some of the sex workers, or sex club workers, or Killing Kittens workers, or Eyes Wide Shut workers, are actually classy looking women in long sleeve shirts. They don’t all sort of wear bikinis and, you know, act like hookers. Some of them are very high class and they are Intelligence gatherers.

Marilyn Monroe had a 161 IQ, she was supposed to have seduced Brezhnev and got secrets from him. And I think that Marilyn actually worked with Jackie Kennedy in a similar realm. They both worked on Brezhnev together – and Marilyn Monroe was actually the brighter of the two, although she didn’t look it. And a lot of the women who can flirt very well are actually highly intelligent and they can be compartmentalised so that they retain everything that’s been spoken and everything they’ve seen.

snip

Jim Fetzer: Hitler was a cousin of Queen Elizabeth II?

Greg Hallett: Lionel Nathan Rothschild was the father of King Edward VII who was the father of Winston Churchill who was the father of Queen Elizabeth II, and Lionel Nathan Rothschild was the father of Alois Hitler, Hitler’s father, and then Adolf Hitler.

So actually, Queen Elizabeth’s father was first cousins – Winston Churchill was first cousins with Adolf Hitler.

And Adolf Hitler was trained in Britain in the Tavistock there and or the Tavistock which was in Ireland up until 1920, 1921, until the Irish Civil War and the South gained its independence.

What I’d like to point out, it shows it very clearly in the video, Prince William is very definitely the son of King Juan Carlos of Spain, and the photos that I’ve got up there show them to be absolutely identical. You just look at them and go, that’s father and that’s son. I’ve got photos of them at age 24 and 28.

And their partners, Queen Counsel Sofia and Kate Middleton, also look incredibly similar. So the last video we discussed that perhaps fathers and sons pick wives which are similar to their father’s wife.

Prince Harry is the son of James Hewitt. Lady Diana organised that both of Prince Charles’ sons would be illegitimate.

So now we’ve got a Law of Succession proposed change, instigated by the Fake Royal Family, backdated to Queen Elizabeth’s abdication on the 28th of October 2011, that the Royal Family and the Monarch jump Prince Charles, the current Prince of Wales, and go to his children.

snip

Queen Elizabeth II abdicated on the 28th of October 2011, confirmed that to us with finding the body of the True King on the 7th of December 2012; and they changed the Laws of Succession done to bypass Prince Charles who appears to be a victim of paedophilia, and a paedophile, and has close friends who are paedophiles, and it appears that his father is a paedophile, Prince Philip.

So they’re creating an entirely new kingship, which is a Change to the Laws of Succession to the Throne of England. And I’ve tried to contact the people who are in charge of it, which is the New Zealand cabinet, and I looked at the CIA list for the Heads of the Commonwealth Countries, and the last time it was updated was December 2008, and that even included Helen Clark as the Head of the Commonwealth Government of New Zealand, when she was no longer Prime Minister from November 2008 – a month earlier.

So there’s not an official list, nor email access, of the Heads of the Commonwealth Governments. And the New Zealand Government is just advertising the Change of Laws of Succession to be ‘religious equality’ and ‘gender equality’ and doesn’t say that ‘it’s only for the children of Prince Charles, the current Prince of Wales’, to become the Monarch.

On top of that, Helen Clark who’s got the most atrocious history, she’s known in New Zealand as “The Vampire” and she’s been photographed and published looking very much like a vampire with a black collar, high, pointy, raised, and she’s a very ugly woman, very very ugly. She was a Tavistock St. Petersburg gangbang prostitute and the Russians will shag anything as long as it was a white woman from the West – it gave them a sense of superiority. So she was a Freud Hilton Graduate.

Then from 1980–82, she was in Wellington working away up the political ladder, and Vladimir Putin was in Wellington under the code name “Valenti Putin”, and he had two body doubles when he was there. And he was collecting the sexual secrets of New Zealand politicians, judges, lawyers, mayors and people of notoriety, and it was Helen Clark who was providing them.

Then Helen Clark moved from prostitute to lesbian. Just before she became an MP, she married a known homosexual child sex abuser in a cover marriage, and then in late 2002 she was noted in an act of paedophilia with a 10-year old Vietnamese girl in Vietnam.

So she’s a prostitute lesbian paedophile . . . and then in order for New Zealand to join NATO, she had to traffic 10 kilograms of NATO’s heroin which she did, through the Minister of Justice, Annette King, who gave it to the Police, and then Annette King became the Minister of Police.

And she is also involved in nuclear arms dealing where South Africa was storing some nuclear weapons in the middle of North Island of New Zealand and they went missing, and Helen Clark had stolen them and on sold them.

So she’s a prostitute lesbian paedophile heroin-trafficking nuclear arms dealer.

And in 2003, she requested the murder of her very close friend, Michael King, and had him murdered, and the person who picked up that murder was Chief Justice Sian Elias, who’s still the Chief Justice. So she is also a murderer.

more…

http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No6.html#.UR5z0WdrTUw

.

home